Which form of co-ownership would Greg and Caitlin likely choose to ensure protection against one spouse selling the house without consent?

Choosing tenancy by the entirety is an effective way for spouses like Greg and Caitlin to protect against one partner selling the property without the consent of the other. This form of co-ownership is specifically designed for married couples and provides several benefits, including the requirement that both spouses must agree to any sale or transfer of the property. This mutual consent requirement helps safeguard the interest of both spouses and ensures that one cannot act unilaterally in the disposition of their shared property.

In tenancy by the entirety, both spouses hold an equal and indivisible interest in the property; neither can independently sell or encumber the property without both parties agreeing. This aspect makes it an appealing choice for couples who want to secure their ownership rights and maintain control over their shared assets.

Other co-ownership types do not offer the same level of protection. For instance, joint tenancy allows any owner to sell their share without the other owner's consent, which might be concerning for married couples wanting to retain control over the property. Community property would mean that both spouses have equal ownership of the property, but one spouse could still sell their interest without the other's agreement. Tenancy in common permits fractional ownership and allows for the sale or transfer of interest without requiring consent from the other co-owners